Since my relationship with the Internet began, around 2014, I had always used Firefox as default browser. I had always used it with the basic configuration that It comes by default, however, at the beginning of 2020 I began to be interested in privacy issues, security online and free software,1 which induced a change in the configuration of the broweser to the settings recommended by Privacy Tools in the beginning, and then the recommended by Privacy Guides (due to the problems in Privacy Tools around 2021).
Due to my —sometimes— extremist nature, I even tried the configuration provided by the Arkenfox project and block first party scripts globally with uBlock Origin. These, of course, did not last long as they considerably damaged the browsing experience on most pages.
Always to check how well I was defending myself against the Big Brother ;-), I used the Cover your tracks provided by the Electronic Frontier Foundation to see how trackers saw my browser and how they could identify me and my browsing habits. However, with Firefox, there was no way —at least functional— to get a random fingerprint. Blocking advertising and most trackers is achieved activating the option Enhanced Tracking Protection from Firefox itself, and with uBlock Origin. But fingerprint, impossible.
At a certain point, and I think on Techlore, I heard about this “new” browser that seemed to solve all the problems and bad decisions Firefox had been accumulating over the last few years, even with default settings. With a little suspicion, and regret to be reducing the user community of Chromium’s only direct competitor, I moved towards Brave, which does protect against fingerprinting in the Cover your tracks test. Still, I have Firefox for when there’s something which doesn’t work in Brave.
Does this mean that I can now switch to Firefox? Well, the truth is that I don’t think so. I’ve been on Brave for a long time now and I haven’t really found anything negative (only that problem with Zotero Connector). On the other hand, Mozilla has made certain decisions in the last years that have generated mistrust —at least— among users. Examples of this are the download token that is assigned to each download and by which each person can then be identified —as far as I understand—, and the VPN that is really using Mullvad’s servers —as far as I understand—.
You can see What is free software? to find out why is this topic so important. ↩︎
JShelter actually took parts of the code from various projects, including the Brave part which is responsible for randomizing the fingerprint. I don’t know if this makes it unnecessary in Brave. In fact, its functionality is not to randomize fingerprint, but to handle JS in general, so I suppose it would be useful als in Brave. ↩︎